Posted in The book | Leave a comment

Overturning Citizens United: “Let’s Finish The Job. Together.”

Good summary of our progress, from Free Speech For People.

Posted in The book | Leave a comment

Latest Wrecking Ball on Democracy- McCutcheon v. FEC

My piece for the American Constitution Society reviews the state of play with McCutcheon v. FEC, the “latest wrecking ball flailing around in the rubble of America’s election and campaign finance laws.”

The Supreme Court heard argument in the case this week (October 8), where “Justice Antonin Scalia bluntly argued that the Court did not need facts,”  as Lyle Dennison at Scotusblog pointed out.

We can expect a decision in a few months. As usual, Scotusblog has a lot of links to the briefs and background in one place.



Posted in Constitution, Money of the few in politics | Leave a comment

Taking Constitutional Day Seriously- And A New Challenge to Citizens United

Constitution Day commemorates the anniversary on September 17, 1787 of the conclusion of the Constitutional Convention at Independence Hall in Philadelphia. The Constitution was not ratified without vigorous national debate and the addition of the first ten Amendments, our BilThe US Constitutionl of Rights.  And,  of course, with the addition of seventeen more amendments (including a new one in every decade of the 20th Century, except the 1940s and 1980s), the Constitution continues to be written by every generation of Americans.

Here’s a piece that Bob Monks and I have on the American Constitution Society blog, Let’s Take Constitution Day Seriously. We note the contingency of the republican form of government, and the challenge for our generation to “keep it”, as Ben Franklin put it 226 years ago after the Convention.

At Free Speech For People on Constitution Day, we rolled out a promising new initiative to overturn Citizens United and to challenge the increasing tendency of activist courts in recent years to fabricate new corporate rights. Check out the Legal Advisory Committee coming together in this work– an impressive group, including a former Chief Justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court and former Justice of the Montana Supreme Court.

Here’s the announcement from Free Speech For People:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – September 17, 2013

Contact: Ryan O’Donnell

(413) 335-9824

New Legal Initiative, Advised By National Network of Law Professors, Former Judges & Attorneys, To Fight Citizens United

Includes Fmr State Supreme Court Justices James Exum, Jr. (North Carolina) and James Nelson (Montana)

Free Speech For People, a national non-partisan organization working to overturn Citizens United v. FEC, has launched a new Legal Advocacy Program, backed by an advisory committee of respected law professors, former judges and attorneys from across the country. The initiative seeks to restore Constitutional jurisprudence based on human, rather than corporate rights, and republican citizenship rather than unlimited money in politics.

Free Speech For People announced the new program on Constitution Day (September 17th) which commemorates the two hundred and twenty sixth anniversary of the signing of the Constitution at the conclusion of the 1787 Convention in Philadelphia.

Advisory Committee member James Nelson, who recently retired as a Justice of the Montana Supreme Court, says: “Citizens United embraces a right found nowhere in the Constitution:  a right to use institutional mega-money to influence elections and silence voices of individual small contributors and voters.” “Worse,” he added, “this kind of jurisprudence presents a clear and present danger for the majority of states, like Montana, where voters elect their judges and justices. Make no mistake — the effects of Citizens United will dominate judicial elections.”

James Exum, Jr., former Chief Justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court and another Advisory Committee member says:Citizens United was wrongly decided and weights the electoral process far too heavily in favor of corporations, which have the ability to amass huge sums of money, at the expense of the vast majority of citizens without that ability.  For those states, like mine, which subject judges to periodic popular elections, the ruling threatens the integrity of our courts.”

The Advisory Committee will work with Free Speech For People co-founders John Bonifaz, who serves as Executive Director, and Jeff Clements, who serves as Board Chair and President and is the author of Corporations Are Not People (with a foreword by Bill Moyers) (Berrett-Koehler, 2012).

“Americans across the political spectrum know that “corporate rights” and unlimited money in our elections are wrong, and are coming together to ensure that Citizens United will not stand. We are grateful to see so many outstanding legal experts and jurists join in this work to renew our democracy of free and equal citizens,” says Clements.

Bonifaz added: “In the face of new efforts by global corporations since Citizens United to strike down public interest laws on ‘corporate speech’ grounds, we look forward to defending in court that fundamental principle of American self-government: of, by, and for the people.”

The new initiative will engage in advocacy and public education to push back in the courts against the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC and the fabricated doctrine of corporate constitutional rights and to advance corporate charter reform in the states. The program also will serve as a legal resource for the growing movement for a constitutional amendment to reverse Citizens United.

The Free Speech For People Legal Advocacy Program is the latest addition to the expanding challenges to the 2010 Citizens United decision, the 5-4 Supreme Court ruling that struck down longstanding campaign finance laws and opened the door to unlimited spending by corporations, unions, and the super-wealthy.

Members of the Legal Advocacy Committee include:

  • Lawrence Anderson, Montana trial attorney and member of the Board of Governors of the American Association of Justice
  • David Ciepley, Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Faculty Fellow, Princeton University, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Denver
  • John Coates, Professor of Law, Harvard Law School
  • Lisa Danetz, Senior Counsel, Demos
  • James Exum, Jr, former Chief Justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court
  • Caroline Fredrickson, President, American Constitution Society
  • Lisa Graves, Executive Director, Center for Media and Democracy
  • Daniel Greenwood, Professor of Law, Hofstra Law School
  • Thomas Joo, Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, School of Law
  • Cyrus Mehri, Founding Partner, Mehri & Skalet, PLLC.
  • Robert A.G. Monks, Author, Founder, Lens Governance Advisors
  • James Nelson, former Justice of the Montana Supreme Court
  • Eva Paterson, Co-Founder and President, Equal Justice Society
  • Peter Pease, Founder, Law Offices of Peter Pease
  • Tamara Piety, the Phyllis Hurley Frey Professor of Law, University of Tulsa College of Law
  • Jamie Raskin, Professor of Law, American University Washington College of Law
  • Katie Redford, Co-Founder and Director, EarthRights International
  • Dale Rubin, Professor of Law, Appalachian School of Law
  • Steven Shiffrin, Professor of Law, Cornell University Law School
  • Jennifer Taub, Associate Professor of Law, Vermont Law School
  • Gerald Torres, Bryant Smith Chair in Law, The University of Texas at Austin, School of Law

About Free Speech For People

Free Speech For People is a national non-partisan organization, launched on the day of the US Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United, which works to challenge the misuse of corporate power and restore republican democracy to the people.  Free Speech For People has served as a catalyzing and leading force in the growing movement across the country for a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and reclaim our democracy.  The organization has also played a leadership role in the courts by helping to defend Montana’s century-old law barring corporate money in elections, resulting in a victory before the Montana Supreme Court and the first test case on Citizens United to reach the US Supreme Court.

About the Movement to Overturn Citizens United

Sixteen states have formally called for a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and to restore democracy to the people.  In addition, nearly 500 cities, towns, and counties, including New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Philadelphia have called for an amendment, and more than 2,000 elected officials nationwide are on record supporting one.


Posted in Action in the States, Constitution, Legal Challenges to Citizens United & Corporate Rights | Leave a comment

Senators Explain Constitutional Amendments to Overturn Citizens United

The proposed Constitutional amendments (here and here) overturn Citizens United by permitting the people to limit spending and contributions in elections and by ending the judicial fabrication of “corporate rights” in place of human rights under the Constitution.

Read letters (with links) from Free Speech For People to Senators Tester and Udall here and here.

Posted in The book | Leave a comment

US Senators From Montana and New Mexico Lead With Key Constitutional Amendments

Senator Jon Tester from Montana and Senator Tom Udall from New Mexico have joined to introduce the two key Constitutional Amendment resolutions to overturn Citizens United.  Emphasizing that “corporations are not people,” Senator Tester introduced a Constitutional amendment that would reverse the  fabrication of corporate Constitutional rights

Here’s Senator Tester:

Joining Senator Tester, New Mexico Senator Tom Udall introduced the Constitutional amendment language that would permit Congress and the States to limit election spending and contributions, overturning the 5-4 Citizens United decision that deprived Americans of the right to do that.

Both Constitutional amendment provisions have been introduced in the House by Representative Jim McGovern of Massachusetts, and have dozens of co-sponsors.

Free Speech For People has more details here.

Also, Representative Nolan has combined the two key provisions into one resolution. Move to Amend has details here.

Posted in The book | Leave a comment

With Cross-Partisan Support for Constitutional Amendment on Citizens United, Delaware Becomes State #15

both parties to blameA big week in the growing movement of Americans across the political spectrum to overturn Citizens United, and it’s only Tuesday. Yesterday, Public Citizen announced that Delaware, the state of incorporation for many of the largest corporations, has become the 15th State to call for the 28th amendment to the U.S. Constitution. A majority of the Delaware legislature, including Democrats and Republicans, signed this letter.

Then, today Free Speech For People rolled out a report documenting the votes and statements of more than 100 Republican lawmakers across the country who have stepped up to challenge Citizens United and support the 28th Amendment. To those who know this effort crosses all political lines, this may not seem news, but the mainstream media have mistakenly tended to consider opposition to Citizens United through the partisan lens with which they are so comfortable. This report may help set right that mistake.

Posted in The book | Leave a comment

The Corporate Surveillance State and Citizens United


The new information on out-of-control NSA surveillance illustrates again how the corporate surveillance state grows out of the money corruption of our politics. The program seems to have been sold to the government by Booz Allen, a corporation dependent on billions of dollars of taxpayer’s money (a multi-billion dollar Fortune 500 with “98% of its revenue from the government”? Could that be right?). According to this New York Times article, after making billions from American taxpayers, Booz Allen is taking the secret program to the global marketplace:

“They are teaching everything,” one Arab official familiar with the effort said. “Data mining, Web surveillance, all sorts of digital intelligence collection.”

Serious question: What does it mean that the person– Edward Snowden– who told the American people the truth about what our government is doing fled to exile and faces prison, while the corporation that built the program on billions of taxpayer dollars is out shopping it to governments around the world?

Here’s “Influence Explorer” with some political spending/lobbying/government contract data on Booz Allen worth checking out.

Original post- pre NSA leak- below.


Once again we are learning of a massive spy operation on the American people by our government and Verizon and other telecom corporations.  For years, the global telcom corporations, including AT&T, Verizon and others, have secretly colluded with the government’s national security apparatus to spy on Americans and others around the world.

This corporate-government surveillance is illegal. Yet in 2008 when groups such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the human beings whose rights were violated brought a lawsuit for the illegal conduct, Congress quickly passed an immunity law, retroactively preventing any recourse against the corporations that violated the law.

What does all this have to do with the movement for a 28th Amendment to reverse Citizens United and end the creation by an activist judiciary of corporate Constitutional rights?

In short: anyone who thinks that we must pretend that the Constitution creates rights for corporations, notwithstanding the words, history, meaning, and purpose of the Constitution to the contrary, is not paying attention to reality.

Some defenders of the kind of theories of “corporate speech” or other Constitutional rights that led to the disaster of Citizens United, argue that corporations must have Constitutional rights in order for the rights of Americans to be secure against government overreach.

And foxes should guard chicken-houses.

More than a year ago, in a piece called “Why Americans Should Support the People’s Rights Amendment,” Ben Clements, a former federal prosecutor, Free Speech For People Board member (and, full disclosure: my brother) responded to this “corporations will save us” argument. He explained how the illegal spy operation in the Bush Administration (which we now have learned was continued or even extended by the Obama Administration) illustrates the folly of relying on Google, AT&T or any other corporation to protect Constitutional rights or limit government violation of the Constitution:

[In the] corporate rights world, your private information is protected from government intrusion only until Google (or Amazon, Verizon, AT&T, Apple, CVS, or any number of other corporate entities who maintain private information about all of us) decides to turn it over to the government. To suggest that we can and should rely on for-profit corporations to protect our constitutional rights misconstrues the nature and role of corporations as much as it misconstrues the nature and purpose of constitutional rights. To cite just one example, the willingness of the telecommunications corporations to blatantly violate federal wiretapping laws at the request of the Bush administration (and in order to participate in highly lucrative government contracts) demonstrates that allowing constitutional rights of real people to become dependent on supposed constitutional rights of corporate entities is ultimately a vision in which only the corporations have constitutional rights.

Over and over again, we see that global corporations do not assert rights on behalf of real people but in active opposition to those rights. And we repeatedly see corporations and the government collude to violate the human rights of real people, just as in the repeated, on-going spy operation of the telecom corporations and the NSA.

Then, when illegality is discovered, and Americans seek recourse, the corporate-government collusion moves into high gear to block justice.

Telecom corporations brought to court to explain the illegal surveillance? Congress quickly enacts a retroactive corporate immunity law and the cases are dismissed.

Monsanto and the federal Food & Drug  Administration collude to prevent Americans from getting the truth about genetically modified organisms in our food? Courts strike down state GMO labeling laws and Congress jumps to enact the Monsanto Protection Act to create immunity for Monsanto.

Firearms manufacturers brought to court for conspiring to evade gun safety laws and common law duties of care, resulting in death and injury to hundreds of thousands of Americans? Congress quickly enacts a retroactive corporate immunity law and the case is dismissed.

Americans know that this big corporate-big government collusion is not serving the interests of Americans or protecting our Constitutional rights. That’s why fourteen states have now called for a Constitutional amendment to reverse Citizens United. That’s why in ballot initiatives such as that in Montana, 75% of the people vote across all party or ideological lines to end the wrongful fabrication of Constitutional rights for corporations and the crippling of our ability to get big money out of our elections and government.

So when someone tries to sell the line that Constitutional limits on government overreach means we must somehow let corporations have the human rights of our Constitution, don’t buy it. Instead, remember three words (and there are lots more): Verizon. AT&T. Monsanto.

In the end, it turns out that preservation of freedom and self-government for human beings really does require that the sovereignty-based rights in our Constitution must be reserved for human beings, not the corporate entities that are creations of, and colluders with, the state.

Posted in The book | Leave a comment

In Cross-Partisan Resolution, Illinois Becomes 14th State to Demand Constitutional Amendment to Reverse Citizens United

Illinois has become the 14th State to demand a Constitutional amendment to reverse the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC. That 5-4 decision ruled that the American people may not enact limits on spending in federal, state or even local elections or on contributions to “independent” campaign groups. The Citizens United decision also ratified the newly fabricated doctrine of “corporate speech” rights, comparing corporations to “a disadvantaged person.”

Legal News Line has a story on the Illinois action here.

And on the expanding abuse of the First Amendment by corporations, see this piece from the New Republic, The Right to Evade Regulation, How Corporations Hijacked the First Amendment


Posted in The book | Leave a comment

Maine Overwhelmingly Passes Cross-Partisan Resolution For Constitutional Amendment On Citizens United v. FEC

nunst030Maine has become the 13th State to enact a  resolution demanding the 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution that will overturn the Supreme Court’s disastrous misinterpretation in the 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case. In that 5-4 decision, the majority held that unions and corporations – - even the largest, multi-billion dollar global corporations – - have a Constitutional right to spend unlimited money in American elections, no matter what American voters think about that. In Citizens United the Court also affirmed again its idiosyncratic dictate that unlimited election spending of billions of dollars by individuals, labor unions, or corporations does not have any corrupting or corrosive effect on republican democracy in America.

Maine joins the 500 cities and towns and a dozen states in passing a 28th Amendment resolution. Other states include Montana and Colorado (where in the November elections, 75% of the voters passed a ballot initiative calling for the 28th Amendment), West Virginia, New Jersey, Massachusetts, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Vermont, Rhode Island, Maryland and New Mexico. Several versions of the proposed Constitutional amendment are before Congress (with more than 100 co-sponsors in total). Free Speech For People has all the amendment resolutions bills here, and breaks down the different amendment approaches from the last Congress in 2012 here.

The Constitutional amendment resolution in the Maine Legislature passed overwhelmingly, with lopsided votes bringing Republicans, Democrats and Independents together.  John Nichols, writing in the Nation, explains: 

When the Maine State House voted 111-33 this week to call for a constitutional amendment to overturn the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the support for this bold gesture was notably bipartisan. Twenty-five Republicans joined four independents and all eighty-two Democrats to back the call.

Similarly, when the Maine State Senate voted 25-9 for the resolution, five Republicans joined with nineteen Democrats and independent Senator Richard Woodbury to “call upon each Member of the Maine Congressional Delegation to actively support and promote in Congress an amendment to the United States Constitution on campaign finance.”

Peter Schurman, Campaign Director at Free Speech For People, helped with the Maine effort and said:

This terrific bi-partisan vote is a huge win, not only for Maine, but for all Americans. Republicans, independents, and Democrats alike are clamoring for a constitutional amendment to reverse Citizens United and bring back real democracy.  We’re thrilled that Maine is now helping lead the way forward.

Andrew Bossie, of Maine Citizens For Clean Elections, one of the leaders of this cross-partisan effort in Maine, said:

For months Maine people have taken action by passing town resolutions, signing petitions, and contacting lawmakers calling for a constitutional amendment that ensures government accountability to voters, not campaign donors. With Maine’s leadership, we are one step closer to making this a reality.

The statement from Maine Citizens For Clean Elections and Free Speech For People, from which these quotes are taken, is here.

Posted in 28th Amendment Action, Action in the States | Leave a comment